Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: The new iPod Shuffle
That's Just Not Right! > KVL's Smart Arses > Computers & Electronics
nun
QUOTE
The latest iteration of Apple’s entry-level iPod, the diminutive shuffle, costs just 28 percent of its retail price, leading to a fat profit margin, according to BusinessWeek.

To be fair, that’s the total cost of the components — not including assembly and R&D. Still, it’s pretty ovious that there’s not much to the shuffle, which was released in March. There are no buttons, and all controls have been moved off the device to the headphone cord. But according to a teardown analysis of the device by market research firm iSuppli, the cost of the shuffle’s components, headphones and the packaging it ships in comes to $21.77.

Arik Hesseldahl reports:

This suggests the per-unit profit margin on the shuffle is higher than on other iPod models. The component cost for the first iPod touch released in 2007, for instance, amounted to about $147, or about 49% of its $299 retail price. The component cost of the third-generation iPod nano, also released in 2007, amounted to about 40% of its retail price.

South Korea’s Samsung is the manufacturer of the main application chip used in the device, which controls music and other functions and costs $5.98, according to the article. Samsung also supplied the flash memory at a cost of about $6 (Toshiba and South Korea’s Hynix Semiconductor also make memory for Apple).

The device’s lithium ion battery that costs $1.20. Interestingly, the device’s passive components — capacitors and resistors — are unusually small, and are “about the size of a grain of salt and cost fractions of a penny each,” Hesseldahl writes. That’s half the size of what had previously been considered the smallest device of their type.


http://blogs.zdnet.com/gadgetreviews/?p=3210&tag=nl.e539

More power to them, that's an awesome business plan. Whenever people ask me about Apple product, I tell them that if they value to image of owning Apple products, and can justify paying 20% extra for it, you'll be very happy with your purchase.

That's the nice thing about sitting at the top of the food-chain, you don't have to sell at cost or at a loss. smile.gif
shirizaki
I never liked the new shuffle. Great concept there, going back to the "pack of stick gum" look people loved about the first gen. But no controls on the device itself? And even if they made the headphone controls mandatory, the should have optioned an extension cord with the remote on it instead of their headphones. Someone breaks or loses headphones, they have lost their music player and HAVE TO find a pair of ipod shuffle headphones. Of course the same thing could be said of a remote extension.

I was going to get a shuffle for the gym, but optioned for a nano after I saw the new shuffle. That and the cost per space was stupid. Twice as much as the last gen 2gb shuffle netted me 4x the storage and a screen while the increase in size was negligible.

Apple products break just as often as anything else, because they don't invest any of their profit into better manufacturing or product control. They function and break just as well as anything else, but somewhat prettier.
Ad Astra
Actually, most Macphiles (like me) HATE the new Shuffle, since it has no controls on the unit itself and instead places them on the (crappy) stock Apple headphones.

Bad idea.
Dean
I agree with the headphone sentiment as many people use their own headphones, but I suppose the thinking is that the demographic of people buying the low-end product versus the feature-rich product is they don't then go and spend extra money on headphones. Personally, I wouldn't like being forced to use their headphones.
Dominic
UGH! I was so pissed off at this. The second generation was perfection. Buttons, clip, and actually in COLORS. Guys, do you remember COLORS? You know, the ones that aren't black or white?

I think that something is going on at Apple. Now that Jobs isn't in control of everything, I think the stand in felt pressure. Like, they have to update EVERYTHING EVERY YEAR.
shirizaki
QUOTE(Dominic @ Apr 14 2009, 09:10 PM) *
UGH! I was so pissed off at this. The second generation was perfection. Buttons, clip, and actually in COLORS. Guys, do you remember COLORS? You know, the ones that aren't black or white?

I think that something is going on at Apple. Now that Jobs isn't in control of everything, I think the stand in felt pressure. Like, they have to update EVERYTHING EVERY YEAR.


Actually it was jobs that headed the switch to basic colors, unless it's more mainstream products, then they offer colors. It brings cost down even further to make only 1 color and only 1 size. The higher priced mac options only give you a single color: gray (or black and white for the iphone). A ton of girls get nanos, which come in different colors.

You can still grab a 1GB shuffle form amazon (and apple I believe). The 2gb seems to have gone away.



But Cook hasn't been too much into Apple lines yet. Maybe he'll get some sense and a price drop will occur to make some decent competition instead of pricing themselves into oblivion. But most likely there will be more aluminum in Apple's future.
Eleazar
Less buttons and more functionality? What were they thinking?

I thought I knew what the ipod shuffle was about. It would have made more sense without those pointless (in a device like this) new functions and a tiny little touchpad instead of that multi purpose button, you click for play/pause and scroll up and down to change tracks, although that doesn't seem to be doable yet.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.